So sprach Pixel am Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 01:23:10PM +0100:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > - Removed CGI.pm from package - newer version is in a seperate package now!
>
> why such a split? (such split are bad for upgrades when not using DrakX nor
> urpmi --auto-select :-/)
I needed a newer version of CGI.pm for a tool that I'm using. Now, CGI.pm
is part of the standard perl distribution, but it's also available
seperately, so that's why I decided to make a seperate package out of it.
Or are you rather suggesting that I should have integrated the newer CGI.pm
into the main perl package?
Alexander Skwar
--
How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (english)
Homepage: http://www.digitalprojects.com | http://www.iso-top.de
iso-top.de - Die guenstige Art an Linux Distributionen zu kommen
Uptime: 0 hours 56 minutes
