>
> > Actually, I like framebuffer independently of Aurora - I cannot
> imagine how
> > could I live with these 80x24 ugly super-large characters on 17" monitor
> > before :-) -andrej
>
> Actually I do not like framebuffer - it's noticeably slower than pure text
> output.
>

It's a matter of taste. It is fast enough for me (I cannot read faster anyway)
and I like look'n'feel of it.

>
> But does this mean that I have to use Framebuffer when I want to
> use Aurora?
> I don't think I'd actually like this (since it's too slow...)
>

AFAIK you can use famebuffer or dedicated X server. I never tried the latter.


-andrej


Reply via email to