>
> Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > XFdrake should at least retain monitor and graphic card type, as the lists
> > are rather long, and uneasy to scroll in console mode. MouseDrake should
> > retain mouse type. Etc... Where is the problem ?
>
> for complicated config files, you can't verify easily if the config
> will work,
> or at least has a chance to work. Aka, it will keep broken stuff. For
> mousedrake, there's no pb :)
>
If user was consistently using tools, config file is parseable. If user
handedited it, at least display a warning that config could not be parsed and
is set to default. Currently it is (exactly in case of XFdrake/drakmouse) too
easy to ruin your configuration beyond ability to run tools again to correct
it :-(
-andrej
