Pixel wrote: > > Ron Stodden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Here are just some of the non-existent RPMs called for by the > > yesterday's installer: > > you're wrong about saying install should be in sync with RPMs. The install > doesn't care what packages are there, except that hdlist.cz and depslist.ordered > should be uptodate. Hardly, since those two files are part of the installer - they must be so classified since they are not installed, n'est ce pas? -- Regards, Ron. [au]
- Re: [Cooker] DrakConf comments Yves Duret
- Re: [Cooker] DrakConf comments dam's
- [Cooker] Wrong link for libstdc++-li... Andrej Borsenkow
- [Cooker] APM vs ACPI Andrej Borsenkow
- [Cooker] kernel: Too many leve... Andrej Borsenkow
- Re: [Cooker] Advancing: Build 449 contains a 2.4 boot... Christian Bricart
- Re: [Cooker] Advancing: Build 449 contains a 2.4 boot... Ron Stodden
- Re: [Cooker] Advancing: Build 449 contains a 2.4... Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] Advancing: Build 449 contains a... Ron Stodden
- Re: [Cooker] Advancing: Build 449 contai... Pixel
- Re: [Cooker] Advancing: Build 449 co... Ron Stodden
- Re: [Cooker] Advancing: Build 449 contai... Guillaume Cottenceau
