:o
I mean a forced INSTALL, not a forced upgrade! However the case for me and
for you seems to be different -- I have libstdc++-2.95.2-xxx from LM 7.2,
and seems you have an earlier cooker version of libstdc++....... it works
for me, but probably won't work for you.......
Abel Cheung
On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, Eric MC D wrote:
> Indeed, many packages needs ibstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3 .
> This one is available by libstdc++-2.96-0.33mdk, this is what I have and
> it contains ibstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3 !
> An upgrade to version 2.10-2.96-0.45 is NOT possible because it DON'T
> contains ibstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3 .
> Are you sure when forcing an update that file wouldn't be erased ??
> Eric MC
>
>
> On Thursday 22 March 2001 20:20, you wrote:
> | This package needs a fix soon, but for now it seems to me that a "rpm
> | -ivh --force" works, since almost all c++ programs are linked to
> | "libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3" instead of "libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2".
> |
> | Abel Cheung
> |
> | On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Peter Ruskin wrote:
> | > On Tuesday 20 March 2001 16:18, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> | > > Daniel Serodio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | > > > I want to upgrade my libstdc++ to the cooker version, but a lot
> | > > > of my programs need libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3 . Isn't there some
> | > > > compat-libstdc++ like there is for glibc? Thanks.
> | > >
> | > > You don't need to upgrade: since we now use the lib policy you can
> | > > install the following package without removing the old one:
> | > >
> | > > libstdc++2.10-2.96-0.44mdk.i586.rpm
> | >
> | > Are you sure Guillaume?
> | >
> | > [19:39
> | > root@penguin:/mnt/downloads/mandrake-devel/cooker/Mandrake/RPMS]# rpm
> | > -ivh libstdc++2.10-2.96-0.45mdk.i586.rpm
> | > file /usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2 from install of
> | > libstdc++2.10-2.96-0.44mdk conflicts with file from package
> | > libstdc++-2.95.2-12mdk
>
>
