when you opened klyx did you go to screen options and make sure the zoom
factor is not a huge number? delete any number that is there if it is
huge
Claudio wrote:
>
> Well, like Greg, I am not able no open any document with klyx, if I try to
> edit a "new" one, it's impossible for no char is shown, and no simbol (I
> mean: maths simbols!) is shown, just QUESTION MARK: "????????" everywhere. I
> remember that klyx was PERFECT in mandrake till 7.1, and unusefull since 7.2.
> I guess that a good product should give only "working-programs", but a
> programm cannot be told "working" just if it do not "core dump"!
>
> Claudio
>
> PS) I can make some screenshot to show you the problem if I am not clear...
>
> On Saturday 24 March 2001 16:12, you wrote:
> > just tried Klyx and it is so slow compared to Lyx
> >
> > see messages like QObject: 49 timers now exist for object
> > MiniBuffer::unamed
> >
> > when I tried to open a lyx doc I could see anything. Turns out the
> > screen options font zoom is set to 150 for iso8859-1. You don't even
> > get one character on the screen like this. Set the font zoom to 0 would
> > be much better for this font.
> >
> > Greg
> >
> > Michael Brown wrote:
> > > On Sat, 24 Mar 2001, Claudio wrote:
> > > > Trying to use klyx... really unusefull. I Would like to know: DOES
> > > > SOMEONE USE KLYX or it's just hold between RPMS to make mass?!?
> > > > Can someone make it usable?
> > >
> > > I use KLyX on a regular basis, and find it much better than anything else
> > > I have ever used for producing technical documents. I did need to fix a
> > > couple of nasty bugs (relating to absent toolbar icons and inability to
> > > type LaTeX commands in math-mode) before it was really useful.
> > >
> > > What do you find unusable about it?
