Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
>
> Arnd Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> > Right. I want to add that fixing this might be the ideal point to
> > replace libSDL1.1 by libSDL2, which has been released recently.
> > There have been only few fixes between 1.1.8 and 2.0.0, but it's the
> > stable release now.
You mean 1.2.0 (BTW, SDL 1.1.8 is declared stable too).
The problem is:
a) many applications in cooker still wants the 1.1.X and aren't
tested with 1.2.0. We can see if everything recompiles with a full 1.2.0
(but see with Warly) for that.
b) other application you don't have the binaries (see Commercial
CD), still needs the 1.1.X (e.g. mtv).
>
> Actually my backport of these fixes to 1.1.8 brought this problem. Guess
> me young skywalker still needs some training with the Force. Fortunately
> it already has been fixed by Giuseppe (by removing the fixes). I'll try to
> get it to work + the fixes tomorrow.
A solution would be to provide both 1.1.8 and 1.2.0 libraries (our
libSDL<major> allows it, and let the applications use the library needed, but of
course we have
to decide which SDL development version include by default (i.e. which headers, static
libraries, etc.)
for developing.
Bye.
Giuseppe.
