On Saturday 07 April 2001 16:08, you wrote: > I think you should check out previous threads about this experimental > gcc/glibc issue. Now they are stable enough to be used. Just because it's stable does not mean it's not experimental. The two don't conflict. gcc can be both stable and experimental. It's a GNU product, and GNU says it's experimental. I've seen many cases in my computing career where the experimental version of the software was more stable than the production version or fixed significant security holes. That doesn't make them any less experimental. - Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [Cooker] Reasons FOR Ma... Vadim Plessky
- Re: [Cooker] Reasons FOR Mandrake... Daniel Serodio
- Re: [Cooker] Reasons FOR Mandrake... Ed Wilts
- Re: [Cooker] Reasons FOR Mandrake... Vox
- Re: [Cooker] Reasons FOR Mandrake... Alan Olsen
- Re: [Cooker] Reasons FOR Mandrake... Ed Wilts
- Re: [Cooker] Reasons FOR Mandrake... Alan Olsen
- Re: [Cooker] Reasons FOR Mandrake... Giuseppe Ghibo'
- Re: [Cooker] Reasons FOR Mandrake... Digital Wokan
- Re: [Cooker] Reasons FOR Mandrake... R.I.P. Deaddog
- Re: [Cooker] Reasons FOR Mandrake... Ed Wilts
- Re: [Cooker] Reasons FOR Mandrake... Chmouel Boudjnah
- RE: [Cooker] Reasons FOR Mandrake... Kevin Krieser
- Re: [Cooker] Reasons FOR Mandrake... Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] Reasons FOR Mandrake... Arnd Bergmann
- Re: [Cooker] Reasons FOR Mandrake... Vox
- Re: [Cooker] Reasons FOR Mandrake... Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] Reasons FOR Mandrake... Juan Quintela
- Re: [Cooker] Reasons FOR Mandrake... Vox
- Re: [Cooker] Reasons FOR Mandra... Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] Reasons FOR Mandrake... Chmouel Boudjnah
