Anything dangerous about using ac3 as opposed to 243-10mdk (for
instance) during install but the other for run? Does the ac3 work
better for hardware and install or something? I remember the horrors I
used to experience with different kernels in install and boot (or in
most cases no boot). Even afterwards all the way up to 243 until the
-10 and on versions. -12 was a pain though. -17 is a charm :). Also a
lot of misrecognition of disk geo/part etc. although those are not
hardly problems with these later kernels.
Wait a minute...I don't even know what ac3 is or stands for :)!
On 13 Apr 2001 03:29:38 +0200, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
> "Sergio P.Korlowsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Thursday 12 April 2001 08:04, you wrote:
> > > Dear linux-mandrake.com:
> > >
> > > what version of kernel is the iso rc1 of 8.0 beta ? is it include 2.4.3?
> > >
> > > sincere
> > > eric
> >
> > yes
>
> 2.4.3-ac3 in fact...
>
> --
> MandrakeSoft Inc http://www.chmouel.org
> --Chmouel
>
