Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So sprach Guillaume Cottenceau am Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 03:37:33PM +0200:
> > why does it choose loop1 and not loop0?
>
> Because I had mounted a loop device beforehand which didn't get released.
It didn't appear into your output of "mount", that's why I asked. This
seemed curious.
> > I just retested on a full ISO image, I can't reproduce.
>
> Happens here all the time - could somebody else please check this?
Would be helpful.
[...]
> Hm, so for some reason the device really seems to be busy.... Hmm. Why?
Please lurk into /proc and see anything.
> And if it really is busy, why can I still (more or less) successfully umount
> it?
When? and how.
--
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://us.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
