Quel Qun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Kyle Jacobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think this new file system should be available in the next
> > cooker, just for "testing" purposes. After all, you never know
> > if it's better than ReiserFS until you try it... Right?
> >
>
> Well, there is an obvious advantage to XFS. The max file system size is 18
> thousand petabytes, compared to 16 TeraB for ReiserFS. Even more important if
> you are using huge files, the max file size is 9 thousand petabytes for XFS
> (4GB for ReiserFS?). Now, my hard drive is only 7GB.
>
> There is an article I liked comparing some journaling file systems at:
>
> http://www.linuxgazette.com/issue55/florido.html
>
> I don't want to start a war about which is better. I just thing XFS is at
> least worth a try.
yes but the integration is a big pain...
