David Relson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Alexander, > > There was a recent message on the Linux Kernel Mailing List - in the last > week or two. > > My recollection is that he said 2.96 is working fine now and that he uses > 2.96 for all his kernel work. > > He didn't say that the kernel requires 2.96. You should not trust your recollection. -- Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] About GCC in LM 8 Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] About GCC in LM 8 Anton Graham
- Re: [Cooker] About GCC in LM 8 Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] About GCC in LM 8 Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] About GCC in LM 8 Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] About GCC in LM 8 David Relson
- Re: [Cooker] About GCC in LM 8 Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] About GCC in LM 8 David Relson
- Re: [Cooker] About GCC in LM 8 Anton Graham
- Re: [Cooker] About GCC in LM 8 David Relson
- Re: [Cooker] About GCC in LM 8 Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] About GCC in LM 8 Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] About GCC in LM 8 Rolf Pedersen
