David Relson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Alexander,
> 
> There was a recent message on the Linux Kernel Mailing List - in the last
> week or two.
> 
> My recollection is that he said 2.96 is working fine now and that he uses
> 2.96 for all his kernel work.
> 
> He didn't say that the kernel requires 2.96.

You should not trust your recollection.



-- 
Guillaume Cottenceau

Reply via email to