Blue Lizard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Once upon a time, not too long ago, Chmouel made a remark about how he
> did not feel comfortable building kernel packages with gcc and would
> much rather stick to the rock solid (if old) egcs releases. I
> wondered in thinking about the long off gcc 3 official public release
> if there would be any greater comfort with using that, or at least
> testing on a few machines that signed waivers, other than the fact
the problem is that the gcc bugs are really hard to trigger, i remeber
compiling all kernel with gcc2.95 until we saw a bug in the a scsci
drivers that does timeout just because it was compiled with gcc2.95,
so i stick to egcs..
> directed to. Also, I had questioned but not been answered as to
> whether Juan and Chmou use the same build host / compiler in kernel
> packaging.
yes we do, not excatly on a same machine but on a development cluster..
