Blue Lizard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Alexander Skwar wrote:
>
> >So sprach Pixel am Sat, Jun 09, 2001 at 02:49:04PM +0200:
> >
> >>5.6.1 is compatible with 5.6.0, so what is the pb?
> >>
> >
> >Well, it looks ugly to have both /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0 and
> >/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1
[...]
> Nice to know SOMEONE understands.
> Does chmouel leave the old modules in their dir and only put new ones in the new
> dir? NO
ugliness and incompatibility are 2 different things.
old kernel modules usually do not along nicely with new kernels ;pp
PS: could you please remove completly the signature of the person you're
answering to? that IS ugly.
