On Wednesday 20 June 2001 05:41, you wrote: > > Thanks for the absolutely incorrect assumptions, gurun. My writing was based on the observation, that the official treatment of a bug-report was abandoned, i.e. 1) bug-report 2) is the bug reproduced, that is real 3) give it a bug number One possible answer could have been, thanks - we will fix it. My 'essay' aimed to show a scenario where the tester is faulted when he has not understood the timetable of the maintainer. Your writing could be read that way. regards guran
- Re: [Cooker] kdelibs woes (was: Mandrake 8.0 updates kill... Michael Brown
- Re: [Cooker] kdelibs woes (was: Mandrake 8.0 updates... Vincent Danen
- Re: [Cooker] kdelibs woes (was: Mandrake 8.0 upd... guran
- Re: [Cooker] kdelibs woes (was: Mandrake 8.0... Vincent Danen
- RE: [Cooker] kdelibs woes (was: Mandrake... Andrej Borsenkow
- Re: [Cooker] kdelibs woes (was: Mandrake... guran
- Re: [Cooker] kdelibs woes (was: Mandrake 8.0 upd... Michael Brown
- Re: [Cooker] kdelibs woes (was: Mandrake 8.0... Vincent Danen
- Re: [Cooker] kdelibs woes (was: Mandrake... Michael Brown
- Re: [Cooker] kdelibs woes (was: Man... Vincent Danen
- Re: [Cooker] kdelibs woes (was:... Michael Brown
- Re: [Cooker] kdelibs woes (... Vincent Danen
- Re: [Cooker] kdelibs woes (... Michael Brown
- Re: [Cooker] kdelibs woes (... Vincent Danen
- Re: [Cooker] kdelibs woes (was: Mandrake 8.0 updates... Arnd Bergmann
