>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> > lo is loopback. doesn't have to do with any real nics
>
>
> Yes, but due to a bug in Aurora, it hangs on the last message that
> succeeded, not the current one, which is the one that failed. In other
> words, if my eth0 hangs when coming up, the last message I see in Aurora
> is that it was trying to active interface lo. Logically, I would assume
> that it's lo that failed... after all, Aurora hasn't even told me about
> eth0 yet. so this may have been what happened here.
>
>
> --
> Sincerely,
>
> David Walluck
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
What is aurora. isn't that rpm -e ware:) But i degress. normal init has
the same problem
