Ainsi parlait David Walluck :
> Yves Duret wrote:
> > David Walluck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>It looks like libavifile without the codecs whould be perfectly legal. I
> >> know I was dicussing this earlier. I have SRPMS of the latest CVS
> >> version of libavifile, but I don't want to release until I am also sure
> >> about the legality of the whole thing. However, sourceforge hosts these
> >> sometimes and they are located in the US. If Guillaume would like my
> >> spec in order to update
> >
> > But, where is the interest to have a package non fonctionnal ???
> > definitly, since there is no change in license, we won't include those
> > kind of rpms.
>
> No, it can at least play avi's without these codecs. Besides, the codecs
> are legal if you have Windows installed. Most users will just have to
> copy them to /usr/lib/win32 (a lot of users dual boot Windows and
> Mandrake, as I'm sure you know).
There was other problem apart windows dlls : it use lame for sound, and
something else i can't remember. Look for exchange between Lenny & me in
mailing archive about this.
Yes, i'm interested in you spec file.
--
Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPG key http://bohm.snv.jussieu.fr/~rousse/gpgkey.html
