On 09 Aug 2001 22:33:05 +0200, Pixel wrote:
> Blue Lizard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On 09 Aug 2001 15:01:46 +0200, Pixel wrote:
> > > Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > > /dev/hda7 / jfs defaults 1 1
> > >
> > > for the moment, do not use / on jfs...
> > >
> >
> > so the prob is not that it is looking for .i586 and not .i586.rpm?
>
> nope. The message used to be without the .i586 because DrakX was not handling
> multi-architecture. It now does and display the architecture.
>
Related question:
What do you prefer when reporting an install time bug? I see people
that submit reports from stuff other than simply surfing ttys. Various
logs and outputs, and of course, whatnot. How (where?) is this made? I
certainly would use such with that dang rpm problem (could it be related
to ext3? I dont think probable, but sorta possible).
