Pixel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Is it necessary? I do care because I have sources on ext3 and it gets
> > mounted as ext2 in installer; may rw mount break something?
>
> ext3 is compatible with ext2, so it should not be a pb.
>
> > Why would we need mount source rw at all?
>
> i can't remember. maybe guillaume knows?
Which "source"? You talk about the installation media? It's mounted
"default", that is without the read-only flag, unless it's iso filesystem.
I could probably mount readonly always, if it's important!?
--
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
