Hoyt wrote:
(..)
>>>Has any thought been given to examining and editing these files? Why
>>>should the lower profile documentation be less important that the
>>>formal documents?
>>>
>>Pixel once said that orthograph fixes were always accepted. Send your
>>patches, I'm positively sure they will be accepted. There is no other
>>possibility, as I am never wrong. I have all confidence in the success
>>of this mission.
>
> 8)
>
> So, would I be sending patches of the files only, the rpms from whence
> they came or what?
I think that the better thing to do for this problem is to use CVS.
> Actually, my post was from a long-ago sent email to Camille. My
> suggestion was to include the script files in the editing process just
> for the comments (not the scripts themselves -- that would be
> foolish). I feel they are just as important as the manual content.
> Never heard from her about it, though.
<Sigh> I guess they are very busy.
Gr�goire
