On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 09:42:45PM +0200, Pixel wrote:
>
> - the count is really too arbitrary.
Sure it's arbitrary. The number should be reflective on your
confidence in the filesystem to not "bit-rot". If you really don't
ever want to do a sanity check, set it to 0, but sanity checks every
now and then are good.
> A server can't wait 3 hours for the 40GB
> fsck terminates, can it?
Nope. Not usually. Can a server afford bit-rot though?
> - that's what redhat does
And if redhat jumped off a bridge? (sorry couldn't resist -- this was
my mother's answer to <....> does it)
b.
--
Brian J. Murrell
