On Saturday 27 October 2001 07:56 am, you wrote: > On Sat, 27 Oct 2001 19:49:52 +0800 (HKT) > > "R.I.P. Deaddog" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, 26 Oct 2001, Vincent Meyer wrote: > > > A number of applications are looking for libgtk_pixbuf.so.2. The new > > > version of pixbuf does not contain this library. Shouldn't gtk-pixbuf > > > supply libgtk_pixbuf? > > > > Strange, what package supply this? I have no memory about existance of > > this library... is it from some old day gdk-pixbuf? If so, then you > > should definitely upgrade and recompile/upgrade all those packages > > requiring it. > > > > Abel > > > > > gtk-pixbuf has been updated once since I first forced the update that > > > broke stuff by blowing away libgtk_pixbuf. Is the plan to replace this > > > library with something else, to include it back in the package, or for > > > some other package to supply it? > > I think you mean gdk-pixbuf, > There are 4 lib pkgs > > libgdk-pixbuf-gnomecanvas2-0.12.0-1mdk.i586.rpm > libgdk-pixbuf-xlib2-0.12.0-1mdk.i586.rpm > libgdk-pixbuf2-0.12.0-1mdk.i586.rpm > libgdk-pixbuf2-devel-0.12.0-1mdk.i586.rpm > > > libgdk-pixbuf2-0.12.0-1mdk.i586.rpm provides libgdk_pixbuf.so.2. > > > Charles Most of the applications that are broken want libgdk_pixbuf.so.2. I think that the updated packages deleted this file. Is this part of that whole Orbit / gdk upgrate thing?
gdk-pixbuf on the 8.1 CD definitely provided this library, which is now not part of this package. I haven't been able to FIND a package libgdk-puxbuf2-0.12.0-1mdk V.
