On Tuesdayen den 30 October 2001 17.44, Brian J. Murrell wrote: > On Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 05:27:52PM +0100, Guillaume Rousse wrote: > > mplayer currently support mmx, mmx2, 3dnow, 3dnowex and sse > > optimisations. Turning them all is not a good solution, and i'm not sure > > which one one would correspond to a 'reasonable' subset: mmx + 3dnow + > > sse ? > > Of course I vote for whatever optimization Athlon's have in them. MMX > and 3dnow I think. :-) Anything else for an Athlon?
one must ask himself what differencies/benefits/drawbacks all these options bring, it just might be enough with mmx only? -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- | Oden Eriksson, Deserve-IT Networks, Jokkmokk, Sweden. | Mandrake Linux release 8.2 (Cooker) for i586 | Current uptime with kernel 2.4.13-1mdksmp: 10:12 | cpu0 @ 814.28 bm, fan 4500 rpm, temp +36.0�C | cpu1 @ 815.92 bm, fan 4500 rpm, temp +33�C
