So sprach �Oden Eriksson� am 2001-11-29 um 21:00:47 +0100 :
> Hmmm..., double Hmmm...., I can't remember writing "You're here also," am I 
> going insane?
> 
> Provides: imap-server courier-imap-server

Yes, good idea.  I'm right now redoing the imap package, and will add:

Provides: imap-server imap

I added the �imap�, because I don't know which package require nothing
but �imap�.

Seeing that quite a lot of other distros
(http://rpmfind.net/linux/rpm2html/search.php?query=imap&submit=Search+...)
also have a package called �imap�, I thought this would be the right
thing to do.

> So, I guess "courier-imap" should at least provide "imap-server".

Yes.

> Actually that damn "imap-2000c" package provides more than it says... It also 
> installs pop servers I don't ever use either. So I guess you were right from 
> start. I don't use that imap package since many years...

Ah, I see.  As I'm redoing the imap package, I'll also split the pop
stuff into a subpackge, which will be called �uw-imap-pop�.  That's fine
with me, because it belongs to the �uw-imap� "server-suite".

> The spec file for "imap-2000c" should be re-made, maybe you could do it, 
> please?

Will do.

> | cpu0 @ 814.28 bm, fan 4299 rpm, temp +35�C
> | cpu1 @ 815.92 bm, fan 4218 rpm, temp +33.0�C

That's strange.  Your first cpu temp is always listed without a . (35),
while your 2nd always has a . (33.0).

Alexander Skwar
-- 
How to quote:   http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (english)
Homepage:       http://www.iso-top.de      |     Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   iso-top.de - Die g�nstige Art an Linux Distributionen zu kommen
                Uptime: 6 days 13 hours 36 minutes

Reply via email to