On Mondayen den 3 December 2001 18.07, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: > Oden Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Mondayen den 3 December 2001 15.26, Juan Quintela wrote: > > > >>>>> "chmouel" == Chmouel Boudjnah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > chmouel> Juan ? > > > > > > Argh, it appears that I did some substitution wrong :( > > > Fixed in 2.4.16.3mdk > > > > What about my tux patches I sent you? (Juan and Chmouel) > > i don't think it's going to be included... reason ? this is because > that is not necessary needed and it add complexity to the mandrake > kernel in some area a lot of patches touch.
Ok, understood. Last night I actually built it with tux and with the patches I sent you, so I guess I have to maintain my own src.rpm kernel then. It would nevertheless be awesome to to be able to run tux+qmail+vpopmail+qmailadmin+courier-imap+sqwebmail without apache on a single box. Also run tux and some cgi based web gui for firewalling would be outstanding... Well, if tux is totally rejected I see no reason to have the tux userspace package in contrib anymore. -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- | Oden Eriksson, Deserve-IT Networks, Jokkmokk, Sweden. | Mandrake Linux release 8.2 (Cooker) for i586 | Current uptime with kernel 2.4.13-12mdksmp: 3 days 1 hour 19 minutes | cpu0 @ 814.28 bm, fan 4354 rpm, temp +29�C | cpu1 @ 815.92 bm, fan 4272 rpm, temp +29.0�C
