>>>>> "borsenkow" == Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> borsenkow> Not mentioning that CVS has no entries for new kernels. If borsenkow> they >> are borsenkow> built from some private repository, PLEASE, move them to borsenkow> contrib. >> >> Fixed in 2.4.16.4mdk >> borsenkow> What? CVS or contribs? kernel spec file name is now again: kernel.spec >> - Cooker has an old kernel that has _all_ the features and a new >> kernel soon that is catching up. >> >> I think that the 3rd option is a clear winner, if your opinion differ, >> I will like to hear. >> borsenkow> Nothing wrong except - it does not belong into RPMS as I have already borsenkow> said. Please, make separate directory under cooker, name it kernel-test borsenkow> or how you like and place them all there. borsenkow> I repeat - these kernels do not belong to distribution, because borsenkow> - our (your) own tools like urpmi do not know what to do with them; borsenkow> you'd have to at least add all of them into inst.list or add support for borsenkow> wildcards borsenkow> - each such kernel + all sources + all docs add up 100MB. You may have borsenkow> these - some people do not. Besides, why build HTML + PDF + ... docs for borsenkow> experimental kernel? All docs are available in kernel-source package. borsenkow> I have nothing against providing them; I oppose to providing them as borsenkow> part of main distro. Fine with me also. Later, Juan. -- In theory, practice and theory are the same, but in practice they are different -- Larry McVoy
