> > > > The reals problem of course is that rpmdrake lists kernel packages when > > > it is supposed to not to do it. > > > My point was as you noted, that rpmdrake-1.4-1 was listing the kernel pkgs > > in the first place, previous version operated in that regards as it should > > and Did not list them. > > why not ? Now as urpmi can _install kernel and not update them, a kernel > upgrade via rpmdrake/urpmi is safe enough AMHA ( AFAIK ) >
Not before it is tested. But if it was intentional, good, let's test it. I just wish a short changelog entry about it (as it was when kernel was made hidden). -andrej
