On Monday 10 December 2001 22:54, Fabrice FACORAT wrote:
> le lun 10-12-2001 � 14:01, Leon Brooks a �crit :
>> Not that I want this much Windows integration by default, but it's a nice
>> option to offer, perhaps as a ``make my computer more like Windows but
>> without the crashes and security holes'' check-box during install and/or
>> as a new-user window manager option for those who do:

>>     http://www.desktoplinux.com/articles/AT2800785910.html

> I was very impressed by Elx. But you can't have this in standard mdk.

> + Elx is heavily specialised ans based only on KDE. So they customise
> KDE a lot and so break compatibilities with others distro and packages
> you can find on the Net ( for example taking KDE 2.2.2 from kde.org will
> break your Elx KDE ).

Mandrake can probably do *most* of what they have done without breaking KDE.

> As it is heavily specialised, it may not be a good server distro. But it
> aims to be only a desktop distro.

This is a maybe. Worth investigating a little, I think.

> Note : they use somes mandrake tools as harddrake and drakfont.

Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery? (-:

> + many things seems to be prelink ( speed impression ) so normal upgrade
> as to be fogotten. You have to stick with Elx.

AFAIK, prelinking doesn't preclude updating, just means you have to do a 
re-link pass after each upgrade.

> + mdk is too heterogeneous. They have 2 desktop ( gnome/KDe ) so they
> can't customise only one of them. They also support many wm.

Yes, at least 10 of them at last count (KDE, Gnome/Sawfish, Enlightenment, 
WindowMaker, ICEwm, BlackBox, xfce, Fvwm, Fvwm2, mwm, twm, maybe olwm? 
However, the specialisations need only be applied to KDE, and preferably kept 
separate so you can log in with KDE-standard or KDE-windowsified.

> + mdk is too polyvalent/compatible/open : desktop, server, firewall. So
> they can't customise too much their scripts/prog.

Polyvalent, true, and I like that a lot. However, to labour a point, much of 
the customisation discussed could be layered over this.

Cheers; Leon

Reply via email to