R.I.P. Deaddog ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Wed, 19 Dec 2001, Sebastian Dransfeld wrote:
>>> --=-=-= >>> Name : Eterm Relocations: (not relocateable) >>> Version : 0.8.10 Vendor: MandrakeSoft >> Why not 0.9.1? I've uploaded it once, and asked several times. It's >> the latest stable release. > Yes, Eterm 0.9.1 is packaged by several people and uploaded > independently to /incoming, but they are promptly removed and > ignored ever since. Is there no intention to use Eterm 0.9.x in the > future, or...? It would be nice if there was a list with non accepted rpms with a brief explanation. So that people don't have to do things twice. Cya, Han.
