On Thursday 20 December 2001 08:15, you wrote: > > Why did mdk make the decision to put kde3 beta1 in contrib instead > > of cooker? kde2 beta1 was put into cooker as soon as it came out. > > kde3 beta 1 is far more stable then kde2 beta 1 was.. Maybe I just > > don't understand mandrake logic.. > > > My understanding of this is that 3.0 stable problably will not be > ready for the 8.2 release, hence the "contrib". Keeping options open > for the release, I assume. (I might however be dead wrong on this.) > > As an aside: other distro's have found interresting ways for 2.2.2 > and 3.0 to co-exist for testing. Anything like this in the pipeline > for Mandrake?
In January 2002. -- MandrakeSoft http://www.mandrakesoft.com Paris, FRANCE --David PS: please quote correctly.
