Ainsi parlait R.I.P. Deaddog :
> On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> > > > [guillaume@silbermann guillaume]$ rpmlint --info
> > > > [..]
> > > > E: batik-svgbrowser invalid-dependency jpackage-utils
> > > > An invalid dependency has been detected. It usually means that the
> > > > build of the package was buggy.
> > > > Uhh ? what does exactly means 'invalid dependency' ? It is a
> > > > dependency not provided by any package in the distribution, or a bad
> > > > syntax for a requires tag ?
> > >
> > > What rpm -qpR gives ?
> >
> > [guillaume@silbermann guillaume]$ rpm -qpR
> > rpm/RPMS/noarch/batik-svgbrowser-1.1.1-1jpp.noarch.rpm
> > batik = 1.1.1-1jpp
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Try a wild shot here: the version number does not end in "mdk"?
There is a special warning for this one, and here it is desactivated.
--
Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPG key http://lis.snv.jussieu.fr/~rousse/gpgkey.html
