-------------------- Start of forwarded message --------------------
X-From-Line: gc Mon Jan 28 15:12:22 2002
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from soumis.mandrakesoft.com [192.168.100.3]
by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.9.6)
for gc@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 28 Jan 2002 15:12:22 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail.redhat.de (wg.redhat.de [193.103.254.4])
by smtp.mandrakesoft.com (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id g0SE9Rp0014079
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 28 Jan 2002 15:09:28 +0100
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 15:09:20 +0100 (CET)
From: Bernhard Rosenkraenzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Guillaume Cottenceau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: problem with grep -i --color
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Spam-From: abuse@localhost
X-Spam-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Subliminal-Message: Microsoft sucks! Update your system to Linux today!
(http://www.redhat.com/download/)
X-UIDL: 8dl"!RW*!!=4`!!TP~!!
Lines: 19
Xref: obiwan.mandrakesoft.com 2002-01.Other:672
On 28 Jan 2002, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> Someone on Cooker noticed that grep -i --color eats very much CPU
> while -i alone or --color alone does not. I could reproduce on
> my machine (conected to /dev/null or to a file, it's quick, but
> on the terminal it's very slow).
I'm aware of the problem - the -i --color combo doesn't work at all ATM.
If you have some spare time, feel free to fix it - if you don't, it'll
take a while because I'm busy with some other stuff ATM.
LLaP
bero
--
This message is provided to you under the terms outlined at
http://www.bero.org/terms.html
-------------------- End of forwarded message --------------------
--
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
