On Wed, 2002-02-06 at 05:24, Stew Benedict wrote: > > On 6 Feb 2002, Bryan Paxton wrote: > > > Now that LSB 1.1.0 is out... What are the plans of making mdk LSB > > compliant before 8.2 release? (I haven't run any LSB test suites, I > > haven't a clue how mdk ranks up). > > I see that there is glibc_lsb, but that's ver 2.2.1 of glibc. > > Will the default glibc be 2.2.4? If so, will that be LSB compliant? > > > > LSB is what a lot of us have been waiting on, it's here, let's use it! > > > > > > Although the spec may be complete, the testsuites and the testing are not. > We fare about the same as most of the rest of the distro's and are working > towards compliance. There are issues within glibc (the system one), as > well as the testsuite itself. As for the glibc_lsb package. I have a > 2.2.4 version prepared, but it's not clearly defined that to qualify as a > compliant distribution, this is even required. Be assured we are working > on it though. > > Stew Benedict >
Great! I'm a happy camper now : ) Cheers.. -- Bryan Paxton Public PGP key: http://www.deadhorse.net/bpaxton.gpg "What laughter, why joy, when constantly aflame? Enveloped in darkness, don't you look for a lamp?" Dhp. 163
