>> which would seem to imply that libgr is dead (as least to the xemacs >> crowd). A quick grep through the header files and documentation (and an >> nm on libaries) showed no headers or symbols which look like they are >> part of libgr. > > urpmi -p libgr-devel will found package which provides libgr-devel
This is all well and good, but packages should not have requires for meta-packages when the meta-package is simply for compatiblity with old releases. The package maintainer should know that libgr is deprecated and change the build-requires appropriately. BTW, the use of libgr has been deprecated since *before* 8.1 was released, so this error has been long standing. -- Anton Graham GPG ID: 0x18F78541 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ... A booming voice says, "Wrong, cretin!", and you notice that you have turned into a pile of dust.
