�R.I.P. Deaddog� sagte am 2002-02-14 um 17:38:02 +0800 : > > libxml-devel, libscrollkeeper-devel: libgnome32-devel > > Are you sure about these?
Scrollkeeper: Yes. XML: Might be. > > gettext-devel, bison, byacc, libbzip2-devel: rpm-build > > I believe no or very few packages can build without rpm-build :) Well, it's not *strictly* necessary, however the reason why I'd include these in rpm-build is that many packages require the above packages. And I don't think it would be right to mention all of the above in each and every package. It's kinda like requiring gcc or glibc in every package, no? I'd like to have a setup where I only need to specify one package and get a whole set of needed development packages installed right away. Or would it be correct if I'd Require: *every* package that the new package needs? With this I mean, that I'd require glibc, bash, filesystem, rpm .... Alexander Skwar -- How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (english) Homepage: http://www.iso-top.de | Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] iso-top.de - Die g�nstige Art an Linux Distributionen zu kommen Uptime: 1 day 4 hours 24 minutes
