On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 05:31:29PM +0100, Warly wrote: > Keld J�rn Simonsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 01:20:54PM +0100, Warly wrote: > >> Keld J�rn Simonsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > How can you test the beta if it does not reflect the final product? > > I think having only two cds in the beta is provoking unnecessary > > problems and not the best QA policy. > > > > Why do you need to restrict beta to only 2 cds? > > Several reason: > > - we have far less bugs in 2 CDs to make these beta pertinent
I thought the purpose of the QA process was to find and eliminate as many bugs as possible? > - such 2 CDs tests are important because our standard packs is only 2CDs > (plus a commercial CD) and it must contain all the necessary application. I see. And the 2 beta CDs are the ones scheduled for the standard pack? That is with rudimentary Danish support? Does not fit the Danish market. Why do you want to release an inferior product when you have a real quality product to bring to market? There is a lot of hype right now about Linux in Denmark, and I would like to use the newest and best to put forward in that battle here. It seems like you are shooting yourself in the foot marketingswise here for the cost of one CD. What price are we talking about here? Half an Euro per CD and package? Kind regards keld
