On Fri, 1 Mar 2002, Buchan Milne wrote: > According to the OO.o mailing list, OO.o is supposed to check font paths > using the output of /usr/sbin/chkfontpath or chkfontpath (which > apparently gives all the xfs font paths under Redhat). This appears not > to work. (I haven't been able to test this myself)
What doesn't work? Here, /usr/sbin/chkfontpath actually lists me the available font paths. > A work-around is to modify the /usr/lib/openoffice/soffice startup > script to tell it about more font paths (obviously the chkfontpath > solution would be preferred). See the attached patch for how to get the > drakfont ttfs working. I used another approach by defining SAL_FONTPATH_USER variable for -2mdk. Probably should it be expanded to the result of chkfontpath in -3mdk. > 2)Spell checking is broken > OO.o should support spell-cheching in en_US out the box. Attempting > spell checking results in all words being marked as incorrectly spelt, > and the following error message: Yes, known issue. Will probably be addressed in -3mdk. > I believe the files should be copied from > /usr/lib/openoffice/share/wordbook/english/ to > ~/.openoffice/user/wordbook during setup, but in the rpm, the only files > supplied are: This is an OOo /net setup bug. Dictionaries are under /usr/lib/openoffice/user/wordbook/* whereas they should be in ~/.openoffice/user/wordbook/. > Otherwise, it works very well. Some issues introduced with the official > OO.o build with gcc-3.0.3 have been solved (probably due to using > gcc-3.0.4), such as the Insert->Frame problem. Yes, that works here. What were the other issues? I still don't see the templates and I am wondering if they are supposed to be in OOo actually... Thank you for testing the package. Bye, Gwenole.
