Raul Dias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >But what do you want exactly, to keep gcc-2.95.3-19cl.src.rpm instead of a newer > >gcc which provides the same libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 ? > > No. A newer gcc would install a different libstdc++ (different soname).
This is exactly what we want. > What I am suggesting is a way to let urpmi detect when a c++ application package > will not work before installing them. How can we detect such behaviour ? Fran�ois.
