On Fri, 2002-03-08 at 18:57, Bryan Paxton wrote: > It perhaps might be the latest gcc, specifically libstdc++, but it > could be my optimizations that made something in libstdc++ fubar... I'm > going to compile for i686, but with the default rpm opt flags and see > what's what : ) > > I'll email back with results : )
Those being that either libstdc doesn't like compiling with the below flags, or gcc is happy with them (2.9.6 from cooker): i686 -03 -funroll-loops -ffast-math -malign-double -mcpu=pentiumpro -march=pentiumpro -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-exceptions -fno-strength-reduce (PIII - 850) Anyway, so no problem with libstdc++ : ) -- Bryan Paxton Public PGP key: http://www.deadhorse.net/bpaxton.gpg "Heedfulness: the path to the Deathless. Heedlessness: the path to death. The heedful do not die. The heedless are as if already dead." -- Dhp. 21-24
