> No, build_prior_82 should be set to 1. Or if you prefer rename > %build_prior_82 to %build_prior_83 or %build_prior_90,
post_82 ? > otherwise > package name will change to uw-imap. IMHO it's a bit too late to do > this right now (you know we are in deep freeze...). OK. we don't want the package to be renamed, but we do want the krb5 functionality for 8.2, right? How about if a post_82 is defined where we put the name change in? Stefan
