Till Kamppeter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The problem is that when the user chose "1", that his choice was rejected. "1" > is a legal choice. If "1" would be not legal, urpmi should not ask, but simply > install "2" automatically.
Oh yes, sorry, Can you try using another X terminal ? To reproduce, remove litqt3 and libqt-devel, and try urpmi libqt-mt.so.3, but any other choices should do it (including urpmi kernel), can you check this is still true ? Fran�ois.
