On 2002.03.25 Ben Reser wrote: >On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 03:44:29PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote: >> There are two things with headers: >> - they came from kernel >> - they are used by glibc >> >> running a kernel and a different kernel-headers is right >> running a glibc and different kernel-headers for the ones that you >> used to compile glibc can harm. >> >> That made that know glibc provides the headers that it has compiled >> against. This let less space for errors. > >This makes sense but why not name kernel-headers: >glibc-kernel-headers > >I think it would decrease the confusion here. >
And it they are always required, why do not include them just with glibc-devel ??? -- J.A. Magallon # Let the source be with you... mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Mandrake Linux release 8.3 (Cooker) for i586 Linux werewolf 2.4.19-pre4-jam2 #1 SMP Mon Mar 25 01:34:14 CET 2002 i686
