On Tuesdayen den 2 April 2002 13.03, Pixel wrote: > Oden Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Tuesdayen den 2 April 2002 12.32, Pixel wrote: > > > Oden Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > I wonder if msec is mandatory now, and can't be left out from a mkcd > > > > session? > > > > > > it is not mandatory. > > > > Aha thanks! > > > > I haven't tried this much, but when installing using the most secure > > model the msec is used to fiddle with some files. So, you mean I _can_ > > make a iso without msec without any problems? > > it is not mandatory, but without it you won't access the security levels. > The default is more or less the normal level (level 2)
Ok thanks! I'm doing serious customizations replacing sendmail/postfix, xinetd, sysv scripts, bind, etc. with DJB stuff compiled statically against dietlibc. It seems much easier to skip msec than to keep up patching it ;) -- Regards // Oden Eriksson
