Cooker is normally pretty stable until they change something major like RPM or GLIBC or possibly the conversion to compiling everything with GCC3. For home use, I normally mix a little cooker with my stable. For work, it's strictly stable. I'm not costing the company money if there is a problem with my home system.
Michael Andreen wrote: > > On Wednesday 03 April 2002 10.29, Laurent Montel wrote: > > Perhaps you don't know but cooker is DIFFERENT from 8.2 ! > > When this is up.. It's been said that it's dangerous to run cooker, but how > dangerous is it really? > > I've been "idling" on this mailinglist for a few months now and I can't see > that it's more dangerous than always compiling and running the latest release > of everything (which I tend to be doing after a while, or "stealing" a cooker > package once in a while and get it into the stable dist), actually it seems > less dangerous since you mdk guys are more experianced and follows the > development of your packages better than me (I guess). > > So what's recommended? Running a stable release and compiling the latest > software/ using a few cooker packages in the stable release or running a pure > cooker system? > > Michael Andreen > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
