"Brian J. Murrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 05:00:28PM +0200, Pixel wrote: > > > > i don't quite know what will happen if you use this in diskdrake. diskdrake > > will still propose to partition it. > > Ahhhh, but in my case this was an upgrade I did, so diskdrake did not > even come up. I am not sure what would have happened, but for an > upgrade, it's not an issue. The only issue was the partition > detection.
ok > > > i agree it should get past the error > > I got past it. Find below my patch to drakx in 8.2 to get it to go > past the problem of not finding partitions on lvm-only disks. I added > some useful information to the "no partition table found" type > messages as well. If somebody gets these errors, it is nice to know > which disk they are on. ok for the enhanced error messages. as for the PV on plain disk, I don't really like that solution. I would prefer to completly skip those disks. That way they won't appear in diskdrake... And the dirtiest solution for this is at least to fix the dead-loop which occured to you :-(
