On Fri, 2002-04-26 at 03:00, Fran�ois Pons wrote: > Brad Felmey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Okay, I can see where it would be difficult to put requires for > > everything under the sun, but how about as a general rule adding them as > > they become known? For instance, in this case we now know that curl > > requires rpm 4, and so we will have rpm >=4.x entered into the requires. > > Yes, no, or did I completely misunderstand what you wrote? > > Most of the time, package are needed the rpm of the distribution they are built > for, now that macros are going to have lower change, it could extend to previous > distribution a bit more. > > Try by modifying the macro and check if it is running.
I don't think I'm communicating with you effectively, but I don't know how else to present it. I still don't think we're talking about the same thing, but for now I'll just keep my (virtual) mouth shut and try to understand by watching other threads on the subject. Thanks for taking the time to try to explain this. -- Brad Felmey
