Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > chkconfig tests for known blacklisted extensions (.rpmnew, .rpmorig, > .swp etc) while ntsysv just checks if service name contains dot (i.e. > anything having extension is skipped). > > I'd like them behave consistently; and I believe the way ntsysv does it > is more simple. > > Should I provide a patch? For chkconfig and (for consistency) for > service (but something strange goes on with initscripts after chmouel > has left us ...).
Yes send me a patch. What do you mean by something strange goes... ? -- Fred - May the source be with you
