Oden Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Would you consider adding a patch for zip?
Well, "consider", of course ;p. > Exerpts from: http://exe2bin.com/qmail-scanner/ > > "To support encrypted zip, you need two patches: one for the qmail-scanner > 0.96 distribution, and another for original zip 2.3 package, that also need > the zcrypt core to be able to support crypto-zips. > The second patch, for the Infozip zip 2.3 software, add two features to the > zipcloak command: -t (added by me) to test if a given file is encrypted > (write a message to stdout and return a flag as errorlevel), and another, -3, > written by Peter Samuelson (I left the antispam trick on his email), that let > zipcloak to accept also password from the stdin (a feature not needed there, > but that it can be helpful) - I just ported his diff, posted to > comp.unix.shell in the 1998, to latest version of zipcloak." > > Basically what it does is that it prevents 3:rd part softwares like > "qmail-scanner" from freezing when encountering a password protected zipfile. > > Here's a link to the patch: > > >http://exe2bin.com/qmail-scanner/infozip-zip2.3-noninteractivepassword+testencrypedfile.patch.gz > > Attached is my zip.spec patch. > > Please, please, please add it... 1- qmail and djb sux 2- qmail and djb sux 3- qmail and djb sux 4- qmail and djb sux 5- why not, the patch seems not intrusive enough to me -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
