� ���, 17.05.2002, � 18:39, Brian J. Murrell �������: > On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 09:08:06PM +0400, Borsenkow Andrej wrote: > > > > 1. boot without devfs > > So assuming there is a reason why I want dev and MAKEDEV on my system > even when I am running with devfs (previous question) I have to reboot > without devfs everytime there is an update to them? YUCK! There has > got to be a better way. >
MAKEDEV does not conflict with devfs. For almost a year already. Binary lives in /sbin and /dev has only link. Thierry said he has solution for /dev. But, folks, just how often do you need to update /dev? It is the second time in more than half a year. C'mon, you can boot without devfs _as_ often :-) -andrej
