Michael Reinsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is it intentional that /sbin/fsck.vfat is missing from dosfstools? > /sbin/dosfsck is present, only the symlink to /sbin/fsck.vfat (and > /sbin/fsck.msdos) is IMHO missing.
it used to be "unsafe" to use dosfsck. That's why it was better not to check fat's. This may have changed (i don't see any mention of danger in dosfsck)
